Evaluation · falsification · provenance
The common thread is putting inspectable constraints around powerful generators: nulls, provenance gates, confidence boundaries, parity checks, reversible transforms, and explicit falsifiers.
A human-in-the-loop judgment instrument that separates error from suspicion, handles partly-right cases, tracks provenance and solvability, and scores sensitivity and response bias rather than rewarding raw flag counts. The 77-item reference bank is intentionally private.
Read the method →A governed bundle, append-only witness, falsification layer, River Gauge, and codec laboratory where lawful form is not confused with truth and unsupported patterns are allowed to die.
Read the architecture →Across these systems, proposals can be fluent, useful, or surprising without becoming authoritative. Promotion requires something outside the generator to agree: a source document, a null, a baseline, a parity test, a reversible transform, or an explicit human judgment that itself stays inspectable.